Rep. Jamie Raskin went on national television Sunday and told America that Donald Trump has 'undoubtedly' committed impeachable offenses, that 'nothing comes close' to the corruption of his administration, and that Democrats have no plans to make impeachment a priority. All in the same breath. Welcome to the Democratic Party in 2026.
What Raskin Actually Said
Appearing on NBC's 'Meet the Press,' Raskin gave moderator Kristen Welker what might be the most politically contorted answer in recent Sunday show history. Trump has committed impeachable offenses, yes. The administration is 'the most massively corrupt presidential administration in American history,' sure. Democrats 'will not hesitate' to use impeachment if they need to. But also, healthcare.
Raskin rattled off a genuinely alarming list of potential articles. Going to war without a congressional declaration. Defying Congress on appropriations. And then, somewhat magnificently: bulldozing the East Wing of the White House. 'If he can bulldoze the East Wing, he can bulldoze the West Wing,' Raskin said. That is not a metaphor. That is an actual grievance about an actual building.
He framed impeachment as 'a tool in the toolbox,' not 'a taboo' and not 'a fetish.' Which is a sentence that had to be said out loud on television in the year of our lord 2026. 'We will not hesitate to use it if we need to use it,' he added, before pivoting immediately to the need to get healthcare to the American people.
The List of Crimes Is Long, The Appetite Is Short
Here is the part that deserves a moment of stillness. Raskin, who served as lead impeachment manager against Trump not once but twice, said there are so many potential impeachable offenses in Trump's second term that Democrats 'don't have time to remotely scratch the surface.' The scale of alleged wrongdoing, in Raskin's own framing, is too vast to even fully catalogue.
And the Democratic response to that is: maybe later. Possibly never. Depends on the polling.
Raskin is not alone in this lane. NBC News notes that Rep. Jim Clyburn said last month that impeachment should not be a Democratic priority if they retake the House, arguing the party should focus on housing, education, energy, and healthcare instead. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, back in June, offered the kind of non-answer that could win a Nobel Prize in ambiguity, saying Democrats 'haven't ruled anything in or ruled anything out in terms of accountability.'
Trump Has Already Done Their Messaging For Them
Trump, for his part, has been warning his base for months that Democrats will try to impeach him if they win the House. He has turned the prospect into a fundraising rallying cry. Which puts Democrats in the unenviable position of simultaneously agreeing that yes, the crimes are real and extensive, while also reassuring moderates that no, they probably will not do anything about it.
That is a fascinating electoral strategy. 'He's guilty of everything but we're focused on prescription drug prices' is not exactly a bumper sticker that writes itself.
Trump was impeached in 2019 over pressuring Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden while withholding congressionally approved military aid. He was impeached a second time after the January 6th attack on the Capitol. He was acquitted both times, because Senate Republicans decided accountability was someone else's problem. Raskin pointed this out himself Sunday, noting that Trump's two impeachments represent half of all presidential impeachments in U.S. history.
The Political Math Democrats Are Running
To be fair to Raskin and the Democratic leadership, there is a coherent strategic argument buried in here somewhere. Impeachment without a Senate conviction is symbolically satisfying and practically useless, as the last two rounds demonstrated. If the goal is actually removing or constraining Trump, failed impeachments may do more to energize his base than damage his presidency.
The counter-argument, which Raskin himself keeps accidentally making, is that a president who is openly defying Congress, spending money that wasn't appropriated, launching wars without declarations, and apparently demolishing federal architecture on a whim represents a constitutional emergency. You don't respond to a constitutional emergency by saying the economy is also very important.
The midterms are coming. Democrats want the House. Their pitch appears to be that they will govern responsibly, address kitchen-table issues, and maybe, possibly, under the right circumstances, consult the toolbox. It is not the most rousing closing argument ever assembled.
The Dingo Take
You are supposed to believe this is a coherent governing philosophy. A senior Democrat goes on national television, describes a presidency defined by war powers violations, appropriations defiance, historic corruption, and literal demolition of White House infrastructure, calls it potentially impeachable many times over, and then lands on: but our real focus is healthcare. That is not a political strategy. That is a hostage negotiation where the hostage is the Constitution and the negotiators have decided the ransom is too awkward to pay during an election year.
The frustrating thing about Raskin specifically is that he clearly knows better. The man managed two impeachment trials. He has spent years making the constitutional case that these tools exist for exactly this kind of presidency. When he says 'nothing comes close to the kind of plunder and corruption we've been seeing,' he is not being hyperbolic for television. He appears to mean it. And then he shrugs and says we'll get to it after we fix the insurance market.
Democrats may well retake the House in November. And if they do, the country will be watching to see whether the party that spent years warning about democratic backsliding has any actual plan for when the backsliding hits its logical conclusion, or whether the toolbox just stays bolted shut with a very thoughtful press release taped to the outside.
Comments