A defense lawyer for one of seven men accused of sexually assaulting a former Cornell student at a fraternity house in 2024 wants New York Attorney General Letitia James off the case. His argument: she told the alleged victim and 'all survivors' that 'We stand with you' before Gov. Kathy Hochul made her special prosecutor. CBS News reports that the lawyer also took care to say he is not accusing James of corruption, which is a very lawyerly way of lobbing a grenade and then insisting you brought a bouquet.
The Case And The Appointment
Here is what we know, according to CBS News. A former Cornell University student alleges she was sexually assaulted by seven men at a fraternity house in 2024. Last week, Hochul tapped James to serve as special prosecutor in the case.
The man making noise now is Andrew Miltenberg, the attorney for Gillio Lopes, one of the seven accused. Miltenberg has previously said his client 'unequivocally denies the allegations against him.' That denial is part of the record, and it belongs in this story. So does the fact that nobody has been convicted of anything.
What Miltenberg wants is for James to step aside voluntarily. He is not claiming a court has disqualified her. He says so himself, repeatedly.
What James Actually Posted
The ammunition here is a social media post. Miltenberg quoted it in his statement, per CBS News. Before her appointment, James publicly described what the accuser, identified as Jane Doe, was 'forced to endure' as 'horrific and unacceptable.' She said she was holding her 'in my heart and in my prayers.' She told her and 'all survivors,' 'We stand with you.'
That is it. That is the whole exhibit. A public official expressed sympathy for someone who says she was assaulted, using the kind of language that shows up in roughly every statement any elected official has ever issued about any alleged sexual assault.
Miltenberg himself concedes there is nothing wrong with compassion toward someone making an allegation. His complaint is that James' words 'could be reasonably be understood as expressing a view about what occurred' before she took on the job of independently weighing the evidence.
The 'No Offense, But' Defense
Read Miltenberg's statement closely, because it is a small masterpiece of the genre. He calls his concern 'not political or personal.' He says this is 'not an accusation that Attorney General James is corrupt, acting in bad faith or incapable of performing her duties professionally.' He adds that he is not suggesting she is legally disqualified.
So what is he suggesting? That 'an avoidable question now hangs over this investigation,' and that voluntary recusal would make it go away. In other words, he cannot argue she is barred, he cannot argue she is biased in any provable way, but he would like her to leave anyway as a courtesy.
Then comes the closer: 'Publicity is not evidence. Repetition is not proof.' Fine. True. Also true of a defense attorney's press statement, which is itself a piece of publicity, but we'll let that one breathe.
Hochul's Answer
The governor saw this coming. Per CBS News, both Hochul and James were asked about the social media posts at the news conference announcing the appointment. Hochul said James 'will follow the facts. She'll examine the evidence and go wherever it leads, and if the evidence supports charges, she will pursue them.' She added that she had full confidence in her.
James, for her part, said Friday she wouldn't comment about her post. CBS News New York reached out to her office about Miltenberg's statement and had not heard back as of publication.
So the official position is: trust the process. The defense position is: the process has a problem. Both sides are staking out ground before a single charging decision has been made.
The Politics Nobody Is Admitting To
Let's be adults about this. James is one of the most politically charged figures in American public life, and a lot of people who hate her have been waiting for a reason to say she cannot be trusted with anything. A recusal fight over a social media post hands them a fresh one.
But the question Miltenberg raises is not frivolous just because the messenger has an interest. Defense attorneys are supposed to push on prosecutors. That is the job. Prosecutors who telegraph sympathy for one side before the evidence is sorted can give defense counsel material to work with later, and that cuts both ways for a case like this one.
The flip side is just as real. A woman says she was assaulted. The state's top law enforcement officer said she stands with her. If that alone were disqualifying, almost no elected prosecutor in America could handle any high-profile assault case.
The Dingo Take
Everyone involved is insisting this is about 'confidence in the integrity and independence' of the investigation, and nobody is accusing anybody of anything. Miltenberg says he is not alleging bad faith. Hochul says James will follow the facts wherever they lead. James says nothing at all. Meanwhile an entire recusal campaign is being run on the strength of a post that says 'We stand with you.' That is a lot of noise for a case where, so far, the only thing on the table is a tweet.
Here is the actual tension, and it is a real one. A prosecutor who publicly takes a victim's side before reviewing evidence hands the defense an easy line of attack. A defense lawyer who demands a prosecutor's removal over basic human decency hands the public an easy reason to roll its eyes. Both things can be true at once. Neither one tells you what happened in that fraternity house in 2024.
That is the part that keeps getting lost. A former student says seven men assaulted her. One of them says it never happened. Seven men deserve individual evaluation, and she deserves to be taken seriously. The fight over who holds the clipboard is a sideshow, and the sooner James either answers it or lets her work answer it, the sooner everyone can get back to the only question that matters.
Comments