One of the seven men named in a former Cornell student's lawsuit over an alleged gang rape at the Chi Phi fraternity house has gone to court to stop New York Attorney General Letitia James from investigating him. His argument: James has shown a "presumption of guilt" against the defendants. The man has not been charged with anything, which makes the complaint about presumptions land in an interesting spot.
The Petition Nobody Asked For
Gillio Lopes, who denies sexually assaulting the woman, filed an Article 78 petition in Albany County Supreme Court on Wednesday, according to NBC News. The filing targets both James and Gov. Kathy Hochul, who appointed James last week as special prosecutor to independently investigate the allegations.
Article 78 is the New York procedure for challenging an action taken by a state or local government officer or agency. Lopes' attorney is using it to argue that James has "unequivocally demonstrated a bias and presumption of guilt against the defendants named in the Civil Case." The filing calls her appointment "improper" and points to a post her office shared on X.
James' office declined to comment on the petition. Hochul's office pointed reporters back to what the governor said last week, which was that she has "every confidence in our Attorney General to do what she has always done: look at the facts, examine the record and draw the proper conclusions."
What Jane Doe Says Happened
The underlying lawsuit was filed last month by a former Cornell student identified as Jane Doe. She says she was plied with alcohol, sexually assaulted and gang-raped at the Chi Phi fraternity house in October 2024. She sued Cornell, the Chi Phi fraternity and seven fraternity brothers.
None of the men named in the suit have been criminally charged. That detail matters for everything that follows, because a special prosecutor's job here is to figure out whether charges are warranted at all. There is no case against Lopes yet. There is an investigation that he is trying to prevent from being run by the person Hochul chose to run it.
How the County DA Lost the Case
James is in the picture because of what happened before her. Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten looked at Doe's allegations and declined to press charges. He has said his office found a lack of criminality at the time. He reopened the case only after the lawsuit sparked national uproar.
That sequence is worth sitting with. The local prosecutor reviewed the allegations, found nothing to charge, and then reconsidered when the country started yelling. Hochul said she was dismayed by how the investigation went, and she handed it to the state's top law enforcement official.
It is a sharp rebuke to a county DA, delivered by a governor. It is also exactly the kind of move that gives a defense lawyer something to work with.
What Cornell Did Back Then
Cornell said in a statement Sept. 28 that it ran a thorough, monthslong Title IX investigation in 2024 that produced "a range of sanctions, which included expulsions and suspensions." A source who has seen the written decision told NBC News how that broke down.
Two of the fraternity members were expelled. Two others were suspended. A third, who had already graduated, was barred from campus. The final two got no-contact orders and were required to write "reflection papers."
Read that last part again. Two men found to have been involved in a process that ended with a university finding got homework. The fraternity itself was suspended from campus and remains barred. Students have staged a sit-in on Doe's behalf, with one telling NBC News, "Everybody is here for her."
Bias Claims and the Fine Print
Let's be fair to the legal mechanics here. Defendants challenging a prosecutor's impartiality is not a novel move, and courts take the question of prosecutorial conflicts seriously. A judge in Albany County will decide whether Lopes has a real argument or a tactical one.
But the petition's central claim is that James showed a presumption of guilt, and the evidence cited so far is a social media post from her office. James has publicly said she is committed to "a comprehensive investigation they can trust, guided only by the facts, the evidence, and the law." Whether a post on X rises to disqualifying bias is the kind of thing a court can sort out in an afternoon.
In the meantime, the filing does what filings like this often do. It buys time, it makes noise, and it puts the prosecutor on the defensive before she has charged anyone with anything.
The Dingo Take
In 2024, a woman says she was gang-raped at a fraternity house, and six people got sanctions ranging from expulsion to a reflection paper. In 2025 and into this year, a county DA looked at it and found no crime to charge. Then she filed a lawsuit, the country noticed, and within weeks the DA reopened the case, the governor appointed a special prosecutor, and one of the accused was in court arguing that the prosecutor is too mean to him. That is how fast the machinery moves once enough people are paying attention, and how slowly it moves when they aren't.
Here is what bothers me. Nobody has been charged. Not one of the seven men has had to answer a criminal count. The only person who has had to stand up in public and put her name on this is the woman who says it happened to her. The man now asking a judge to block the investigation is complaining about a presumption of guilt, while the actual presumption that ran this case for two years was that nothing criminal had occurred.
Lopes has every right to challenge the appointment, and he has every right to deny the allegations. A court will decide whether Letitia James is fit to run this. But if the system had done its job the first time, nobody would be reading about a special prosecutor, a gubernatorial appointment, or an Article 78 petition. They would be reading about a verdict or a dismissal that people could actually trust.
Comments