Republicans just got hit with the biggest midterm beating an incumbent party has taken in more than 50 years. They lost Senate seats they had held for decades. They lost House seats drawn specifically so that only Republicans could win them. And the Democrats who now hold the gavels are telling reporters, with straight faces, that impeachment is not on the agenda.
A Cataclysm With Fine Print
Let's start with the scale of the thing, because it deserves a minute. Tuesday's midterms were, per The Guardian's reporting, the worst defeat for an incumbent party in more than half a century. Safe seats went down. Gerrymandered seats went down. Ballot counting is still going, but if the two outstanding Senate races break the right way, Democrats and their allies will hold 56 Senate seats.
That is a monumental return to power for a party that has spent most of Trump's second term looking like a raccoon trapped in a recycling bin. They ran on three words, "costs, chaos, corruption," and voters apparently found those three words more convincing than anything the other side had to offer.
Now comes the part where winning has to turn into doing something. Democrats still have a deeply unpopular party brand, which is a remarkable thing to say about a team that just won this big. Voters did not suddenly fall in love with them. They just got really, really tired of the alternative.
The Veto Pen and the Filibuster Problem
Here's where the champagne goes a little flat. Trump is still in the White House until January 2029, and he can veto anything that doesn't pass with overwhelming support. That is a lot of vetoing for a man who has strong feelings about being told no.
Then there's the filibuster. Democrats leaned on it hard during the first half of Trump's second term to block Republican bills that tried to go through on party lines. Now the shoe is on the other foot, and Republicans can use that same 60-vote threshold to bury any Democratic bill that can't clear it. Irony is a hell of a drug.
So the legislative power Democrats just won is real but fenced in. They can pass things out of the House. They can pass things out of the Senate if they find the votes. Getting any of it signed is a different sport entirely.
The Plan: Pass It, Get It Vetoed, Run On It
Greg Casar, who chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus, laid out the strategy with refreshing bluntness. The idea is to send popular bills to Trump's desk every single week and let him deal with them. Price gouging bans. A ban on Super PACs. A ban on stock trading by lawmakers.
"If [Trump] vetoes it, then that is the platform upon which candidates can run in 2028, and then we can get signed into law in 2029," Casar said. He also said the party's eventual presidential nominee shouldn't be getting asked about plastic-straw bans, which is a pointed little jab at the last decade of Democratic messaging.
It's a cynical plan in the useful sense of the word. Nobody is pretending a veto-proof majority is coming. The bills are the message, and the veto is the punchline. Whether voters actually pay attention to a weekly parade of doomed legislation is another question, but at least it's a strategy with a spine.
Healthcare, Tariffs, and an Iran Problem
On the agenda from incoming House Speaker Hakeem Jeffries: restoring the premium tax credits for Affordable Care Act plans and undoing the Medicaid cuts Republicans passed last year. He also promised legislative action to force Trump to roll back his tariffs and to end the conflict with Iran.
The healthcare piece is not new territory. Democrats' demand to extend the ACA subsidies is what triggered last year's record-long government shutdown, and their candidates ran hard on warnings about the coming Medicaid cuts. The outgoing Republican majorities have so far rejected attempts to fix either one.
The Iran war powers fight is the stranger thread. Democrats had some luck getting the Republican majority to vote for war powers resolutions meant to end the conflict, and one measure did pass. It tells you something that even this Congress has had trouble stomaching the whole thing.
Lawyer Up: The Subpoena Era Begins
While the lawmaking runs on a slow track, the investigating is about to get fast. Robert Garcia, who will lead the House oversight panel, publicly told potential targets to "lawyer up" and said to expect inquiries into alleged corruption in DHS contracting, stock trading by lawmakers, corporate profiteering, and the government's release of files related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Jamie Raskin, expected to run the House judiciary committee, has already sent more than 200 demands for information to the Trump administration and others. Asked who he'd investigate next, he said to "go back and read my letters." Those letters had no legal force, because Raskin has been in the minority. That ends the moment Democrats take the committee gavels. Gavels come with subpoenas.
So the people who have spent two years ignoring angry letters are about to receive documents that carry consequences. That is the single biggest shift on this list, and it will arrive before most of the legislation does.
Impeachment Is Off the Table, and They Know Why
One thing is conspicuously missing from the plan: a third impeachment. Trump was impeached twice in his first term, once over leveraging aid to undermine his political rivals and once after his supporters attacked the Capitol on January 6. Senate Republicans rescued him both times.
Democrats have accused Trump of violating the law and the Constitution regularly during his second term, but they appear clear-eyed about how the Senate math works. "I haven't had a single member of the House Democratic Caucus talk to me about impeachment," Jeffries said. "We've been relentlessly focused on affordability and on accountability."
That is a calculated call, and a defensible one. An impeachment that dies in a Republican-friendly Senate hands Trump an acquittal he can wave around for the next two years. Subpoenas, hearings, and a stack of vetoed bills give Democrats a record to run on instead.
The Dingo Take
Democrats say impeachment is off the table because the Senate would just acquit him again, and then they announce a plan to send Trump a stack of bills they fully expect him to veto. Read that twice. The party is being coy about not wanting a show trial while building an entire two-year strategy around staged confrontations with a president who has never once lost a staring contest with a camera.
To be fair, it might work. Price gouging bans, stock trading bans for members of Congress, and restored health coverage are not exotic ideas. They poll like puppies. If Trump vetoes the stock trading ban, he gets to explain to the country why lawmakers should keep playing the market with inside information. That is a genuinely lousy hill to die on, and Democrats know it.
But the lesson of the last decade is that winning an election and winning an argument are different jobs. The party brand is still deeply unpopular. The filibuster is still a weapon Republicans can swing back. And the 2028 nominee is two long years away from any of this mattering. Democrats got handed the gavels. Now they have to prove they know what to do with a subpoena. Garcia told targets to lawyer up. Good. The rest of us will be getting the popcorn.
Comments