Wages are growing at 3.2%. Inflation is running at 3.4%. If you're doing that math and feeling vaguely nauseous, you are doing the math correctly. The Bureau of Labor Statistics is set to release the July consumer price index this morning, and economists surveyed by Dow Jones are projecting it will show that, once again, the cost of living is outrunning what most Americans are being paid to live.
The Numbers, and Why They're Bad
The projected July CPI reading of 3.4% would actually be a tiny improvement from June's 3.5% annual rate, according to NBC News. On any other planet, in any other economy, a one-tenth-of-a-percent dip would be cause for a shrug. In this one, it's being reported as something approaching good news, which tells you everything about where we are.
The problem is the gap. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday that average hourly wages grew at a 3.2% annual clip in July. Inflation, again, is at 3.4%. That means every month your paycheck technically gets a little bigger, and every month it buys a little less. This is not a rounding error. This is a sustained, grinding erosion of purchasing power that economists have a polite word for: stagflation.
Stagflation is what happens when the economy stagnates, wages flatten, and prices stay elevated anyway. It's the economic equivalent of your car breaking down uphill. The last time the United States dealt with it in a serious way was the 1970s, and it took Paul Volcker hiking interest rates to nearly 20% to kill it. That comparison is not meant to comfort you.
The Iran War Is Still Happening, In Case You Forgot
Here is a sentence that should be front-page news every single day until it stops being true: the United States is still at war with Iran, and that war is keeping gas above four dollars a gallon. NBC News reports that U.S. crude oil prices neared $85 per barrel on Tuesday, while international Brent crude rose as high as $90 per barrel.
CPI spiked to 4.2% back in May when the conflict pushed crude prices sharply higher. Then it came down a bit when President Trump announced the U.S. was canceling strikes on Iran and was close to a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. That deal did not happen. The war did not stop. Energy prices crept back up. Economists at PNC Financial wrote in a note Monday that energy prices should provide a modest downward pressure on July's CPI, but "likely not to the same extent as in June." In other words, the relief valve isn't working as well as it was.
And it's not just gas. Goldman Sachs economists forecast that airfare prices rose 2% in July, which they attributed to the rebound in jet fuel prices passing through to consumers. So if you were thinking about taking a vacation from all of this, good luck affording the flight.
The Fed Is Done Being Patient
Beth Hammack, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, went on LinkedIn on Tuesday. Not to post a humble-brag about a conference she attended. To post that "now is the time to act" on inflation. On LinkedIn. That's where we are.
Hammack had already told Yahoo Finance on Monday that a single quarter-point rate hike "probably doesn't do a whole lot for the economy," which is Fed-speak for: we are considering doing more than one of these things, and you should prepare accordingly. The Fed's next rate decision is scheduled for September 16. If you have a variable-rate mortgage, a car loan, or any credit card debt, you should probably read that sentence again.
Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari was equally direct in a July 31 statement, writing that "inflation has been elevated relative to our 2 percent target for more than five years." Five years. NBC News reports that Kashkari pointed to Trump's trade wars, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and the Iran war as root causes. He also flagged something less obvious, and frankly more alarming, as an accelerant.
The AI Data Center Problem Nobody Is Talking About Enough
Kashkari's statement identified the artificial intelligence data center boom as a separate and significant driver of inflation, and the mechanism here is worth understanding. AI data centers require massive quantities of computer memory chips. The market for those chips is controlled by a very small number of companies: Samsung, SK Hynix, Western Digital, and Micron. With demand from AI buildout exploding, those manufacturers have dramatically raised prices, NBC News reports.
That increase has cascaded into consumer products. Apple has already raised prices on its devices, and Microsoft's Xbox and Sony's PlayStation have followed. Apple told NBC News in a June statement: "We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly. We have now reached a point where we need to begin raising prices." So your iPhone, your gaming console, and your laptop are all getting more expensive because tech companies decided to build server farms the size of small cities.
This is the part of the story that tends to get buried under the gas price headlines, and it shouldn't. Energy prices fluctuate with geopolitics. Memory chip prices tied to a structural, years-long AI infrastructure buildout are a different animal entirely. There is no Strait of Hormuz deal that fixes this one.
The Core Number and What Wall Street Is Watching
Strip out food and energy, and you get what economists call "core" CPI. It's the number the Fed cares most about because it smooths out the volatile stuff and shows the underlying inflation trend. Core CPI is expected to rise 0.2% from June, and on an annual basis is projected to tick down slightly to 2.5% from 2.6%, according to NBC News.
That sounds almost okay until you remember the Fed's target is 2%. As Kashkari noted, inflation has been above that target for over five years. The Federal Reserve has been hoping, meeting after meeting, that supply chains would normalize, that trade wars would ease, that some combination of factors would bring the number down without requiring aggressive action. That strategy appears to be over. Multiple Fed officials are now publicly calling for rate hikes, and Hammack's LinkedIn post is not the kind of thing central bankers write when they're planning to sit on their hands in September.
The Dingo Take
You are supposed to believe this is all very complicated. A perfect storm of overlapping crises, none of which any single administration could have controlled. A war, a pandemic hangover, a chip shortage, a tech boom, global supply shocks. And sure, some of that is true. Supply shocks are real. But Neel Kashkari himself listed "Trump's trade wars" right alongside the Iran war and Russia's invasion of Ukraine as root causes of five-plus years of above-target inflation. The trade wars were a choice. A deliberate, avoidable, economists-screamed-not-to-do-this choice. That part doesn't get a pass just because oil prices are complicated.
The stagflation framing is the one that should be keeping people up at night. Stagflation is not just a bad month or two. It's an economic trap where the medicine for one problem makes another worse. Want to fight inflation? Raise rates. But raising rates slows the economy and kills jobs, which is bad when wage growth is already lagging. The 1970s took years to escape, and the escape itself was brutal. The Fed is now signaling it may hike rates multiple times, which means the cost of your debt is going up while your real wages are going down. Both things, simultaneously, by design.
And while all of that unfolds, the Iran war is still going, the Strait of Hormuz deal that was "close" never materialized, and Apple is blaming AI chip prices for why your next phone costs more. The through-line connecting all of it is a series of decisions made at the policy level, by people who will be fine regardless of how this plays out, affecting people who absolutely will not be. Gas is over four dollars a gallon. Wages aren't keeping up. The Fed is about to make borrowing more expensive. And somewhere, a LinkedIn notification just told Beth Hammack that her post is getting engagement.
Comments