The U.S. national debt just blew past $40 trillion, the federal government is running a $2 trillion annual deficit, and Donald Trump's big idea is to mail every American adult a $5,000 check. Rand Paul, to his credit, looked at this situation and said no. He is now, somewhat predictably, thinking about running for president.
The 'Trump Dividend,' Explained in All Its Glory
Trump floated the proposal earlier this month at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas, where he called it, without apparent irony, 'the Trump dividend.' The pitch is simple: if Republicans win both chambers of Congress in the midterms, every American adult gets five grand. No means testing, no strings, just a check with the presidential brand on it.
Fox News Digital asked Paul about it on Thursday, and he did not take long to get to the point. 'We're running $2 trillion dollars short,' he said. He added that he 'can't imagine giving out money when you're running a deficit.' This is, genuinely, a reasonable position. It is also, in the current Republican Party, something close to a radical one.
The Debt Is $40 Trillion and Both Parties Built It
Paul's criticism didn't stop at the dividend. He took the wider view, which he is at least consistent about. 'It is literally out of control,' he told Fox News Digital. 'And really both parties have failed us because both parties are afraid to tell the American public that some things they like from government would have to be reduced when we cut costs.'
Hard to argue with that. The debt crossed $40 trillion and is accelerating. Paul traced a chunk of the acceleration to the COVID era, when, as he put it, 'both parties frankly started passin' out money like drunken sailors.' He is not wrong about that either. The drunken sailor analogy covers a lot of ground from 2020 through the present.
Paul has a plan he says would balance the budget in five years, which he calls the 'six-penny plan.' The idea is to cut federal spending by 6% annually, let economic growth lift revenues, and watch the lines cross into solvency by year five. Social Security would be exempt. Medicare would not, though Paul argues you could cut Medicare spending 6% without cutting a single health benefit by eliminating waste and fraud and adding means testing. That is a claim that deserves serious scrutiny, but at least someone is making the argument.
About That 2028 Presidential Flirtation
Here is where it gets interesting. Paul told Fox News Digital he is '50-50' on running for president in 2028, saying he will decide after the midterms. His pitch, as he describes it, is essentially that someone has to be the free-market candidate in a field he fears will be all populists.
'I don't want there to be a choice of four populists running for president,' he said. 'I want there to be at least one free-market candidate. I could be that, or maybe somebody else could be.' He ran in 2016, finished fifth in Iowa, and dropped out. A 50-50 shot at another go seems generous by his own track record, but the ideological lane he's describing is at least real and at least currently vacant.
The Republican Party in 2026 is not exactly a hotbed of fiscal restraint or free-trade orthodoxy. Paul isn't wrong that nobody else is making this argument loudly. Whether Republican primary voters want to hear it is a separate and more depressing question.
The Rest of the Party Isn't Exactly On Board Either
Paul isn't alone in his skepticism of the $5,000 check. Fox News Digital has reported that other GOP lawmakers have also pumped the brakes, with at least one asking the obvious question: 'Where are you getting the money?' It is a fair question. It is also the kind of question the Republican Party spent years training itself not to ask.
The White House had not responded to Fox News Digital's request for comment on Paul's criticism as of publication. Make of that what you will.
The Dingo Take
You are supposed to believe that the party of fiscal responsibility is seriously debating whether to borrow money it doesn't have to send $5,000 checks to every adult in America, while the national debt sits at $40 trillion and the annual deficit runs $2 trillion deep. And the guy standing up to call this insane is Rand Paul, who is not exactly known as the conscience of the Senate, and who is half-seriously floating another presidential run as his reward for noticing that two plus two does not equal five.
Paul is right about the dividend. Full stop. Handing out borrowed money during a $2 trillion deficit is not fiscal policy, it's a campaign commercial with a price tag the next generation gets to pay. The fact that it took Rand Paul to say this out loud, while most of the Republican caucus quietly nodded along with Trump in Dallas, tells you everything you need to know about where the party's principles actually live right now.
But don't let Paul off too easy here. His 'six-penny plan' deserves real scrutiny, particularly the claim that you can carve 6% out of Medicare without touching a single benefit. That's a heavy lift and a suspiciously convenient one. The man is right to call out the madness. He's also auditioning for a presidential run and has every incentive to sound like the only adult in the room. Both things can be true.
Comments