Four days before Alaska votes, the Justice Department asked a judge to make state election workers separate every ballot that ranks a retired teacher named Dan J. Sullivan, so federal investigators can later decide whether voters were confused. The state's lawyers replied that this is physically impossible without violating ballot secrecy. The Justice Department wants a ruling by Monday.
The Ask: Sort the Ballots Before the Election Happens
Here is what happened, per reporting from NPR News and The Associated Press. In a filing, an Assistant U.S. Attorney asked the court to order Alaska to "preserve and segregate all ballots ranking Daniel J. Sullivan" so the government can investigate whether those rankings were "the product of voter confusion, should such an investigation become necessary."
Should such an investigation become necessary. Read that again. The Justice Department is asking for a court order now to set aside evidence for a crime it has not yet established happened, in an election that has not yet taken place, on the theory that a result it has not yet seen might be one it doesn't like.
The race is Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan against Democratic former Rep. Mary Peltola, one of a handful of contests expected to decide control of the Senate. The filing requests a decision by Monday. Election Day is Tuesday.
The Other Sullivan Has a Boat Dealer Who Is Not Confused
The backstory is a spoiler candidacy that sounds like a bad sitcom pitch. A retired teacher named Dan J. Sullivan landed on the ballot with the same name as the Republican incumbent. A New York Times report said Peltola's campaign appeared to be involved in recruiting him. Peltola denies it: "I am not interested in tricking voters." Democrats, including the DSCC, deny any involvement. The candidate himself has long denied he was running at Democrats' behest.
So federal agents went looking for confused voters. One of them showed up at a boat dealership in the candidate's hometown of Petersburg. The owner, who had donated to the candidate's campaign, told the AP the FBI agent wanted to know whether he had been misled. He had not. His answer, in full: "Everybody knows who the incumbent is."
That is one data point, and it is the only one in the reporting, and it cuts against the whole theory.
Alaska Already Did the Obvious Thing
Meanwhile, state officials did what you do when two candidates share a name. They printed different names. The senator appears on the ballot as Dan S. Sullivan, Republican and incumbent. The challenger appears as Daniel J. Sullivan Jr., with no party affiliation. That is how they appeared in the August primary too.
Alaska also uses ranked choice voting, which means a voter who worries about mixing them up can rank both. State attorneys pointed this out, along with the more basic problem: ballots get commingled in the ballot box on Election Day. Pulling out the ones ranking Daniel J. Sullivan would mean reading voters' choices in a way that violates ballot secrecy protections.
And even if they could do it, the state noted, a segregated ballot would not reveal why any voter ranked him. A ballot cannot tell you what was in someone's head. It only says who they picked.
A Criminal Probe, Announced at the Worst Possible Time
On Friday, U.S. Attorney Michael Heyman held a press conference in Anchorage to confirm a criminal investigation into the whole scheme. He would not say what crimes are being looked at or who the targets are. He did ask the public for tips. He also said the probe has run for months, but that the Times revelations prompted a "significant surge of law enforcement assets to Alaska."
This is a big deal for a simple reason. It is highly unusual for the Justice Department to publicly confirm a criminal investigation at all. The department has also had a longstanding practice of avoiding public steps in the weeks before an election that could affect the outcome. Doing both, four days out, in a Senate race that could flip the chamber, is not a rounding error on that tradition. It is a bonfire.
So the public gets an announcement with no named crime, no named target, and a plea for tips, timed to land right before people vote.
The Lawsuit Aimed at Certification
The ballot request is part of a civil suit the Justice Department filed last week seeking to block certification of the Senate race if the incumbent loses. Read that sentence slowly. The suit is conditional on the Republican losing. President Donald Trump has said he told the department to file it.
The department also filed a list of proposed questions it wants to compel the Peltola campaign and the DSCC to answer. Government lawyers argue there is a "substantial risk" that the second Sullivan's candidacy "will mislead voters and ultimately result in an electoral process that lacks integrity."
There is a pattern here. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently rejected a Justice Department request for California to set aside disputed ballots from some 20,000 people the administration contends may not be U.S. citizens. California argued the list is highly unreliable and probably includes many citizens. Different state, same move: segregate the ballots now, fight about legitimacy later.
The Dingo Take
The Justice Department says it is protecting the integrity of the election. The facts say it is asking a court to quarantine ballots before anyone has cast them, in a lawsuit designed to block certification if the president's side loses, filed because the president told it to. Integrity is a funny word for that.
None of this means the spoiler scheme, if it happened, is fine. If Democratic operatives recruited a same-name candidate to siphon votes, that is sleazy, and Peltola and the DSCC deserve hard questions and real answers. A real investigation can follow real evidence wherever it goes. But a real investigation does not hold a press conference with no crime named, four days out, and ask for a court order on a Friday to be decided by Monday. The only confused voter the FBI has publicly turned up so far is a boat dealer who told them, essentially, that Alaskans are not idiots.
Here is the part that should keep everyone up at night, regardless of party. The remedy being built is not for fixing an election. It is for contesting one. Pre-label the ballots, pre-file the suit, pre-announce the probe, and then if the numbers come in wrong, you have a ready-made story about why they don't count. That is not law enforcement. That is a script. And Alaska's election officials, who already put two different names on the ballot, appear to be the only adults in the room.
Comments