With a 6 a.m. post to X on Friday, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) drove what may be the final nail into Todd Blanche's bid to become the next Attorney General of the United States. The nomination, already on life support, is now hanging by a thread — and the thread has a name: Bill Cassidy.
One More No and It's Over
Here's the math, and it is brutal. NBC News reports that with Murkowski and fellow centrist Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) both opposing Blanche, and Democrats universally expected to vote no, a single additional Republican defector would sink the nomination outright. Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is out indefinitely, which tightens the margin even further. Trump can afford exactly zero more defections.
That puts an uncomfortable amount of pressure on Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), a man Trump actively tried to remove from office. When NBC News asked Cassidy on Thursday how he planned to vote, his answer was two words: "No comment." Two words that, in the current political climate, are doing the work of a full press release.
What Murkowski Actually Said
Murkowski did not pull punches. In her statement, she wrote: "The country needs an Attorney General who will check the worst impulses of this administration. I hope Mr. Blanche is able to achieve that, if confirmed, but I simply do not have confidence that will be the case."
Read that again. She is not saying Blanche is uniquely evil. She is saying she does not trust him to do the one basic thing an Attorney General is supposed to do, which is act as a check on the executive branch rather than a weapon of it. That is a damning assessment of a man Trump picked specifically because of his personal loyalty.
According to Axios, Murkowski published her announcement at 6 a.m. Eastern, which tells you she either spent a sleepless night working up the nerve or wanted to get ahead of the weekend news cycle before anyone could pressure her out of it. Either way, she knew what she was doing.
The DOJ Grievance List Is Long
Murkowski did not just issue a vague statement of no confidence. She came with receipts. NBC News reports she raised specific concerns about the "politicization" and, in her words, "even weaponization" of the Justice Department, warning that this trend has accelerated under the current Trump administration.
She also called out the DOJ's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, a case that has become a litmus test for whether this Justice Department is capable of operating independently from White House pressure. And she took direct aim at the administration's proposed $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization" fund, which she flatly called a "slush fund" in her announcement. The fund's name alone should have been a warning sign. When your anti-corruption program sounds like it was named by someone who does not know what irony is, you have a problem.
Who Is Todd Blanche, Anyway
Todd Blanche was Trump's personal defense attorney during his federal criminal trials. He is not a career DOJ official. He is not a former judge or a seasoned prosecutor known for independence. He is the man who spent years keeping Donald Trump out of prison and is now being asked to run the department that prosecutes federal crimes.
The fact that this nomination was ever considered uncontroversial within Republican circles tells you something about where the party's baseline has settled. Murkowski is not asking for a liberal. She is asking for someone who can say no to the president occasionally, which is the absolute floor of what the job requires. Blanche has given her no evidence he is that person.
What Happens Now
The White House has not announced any intention to pull Blanche's nomination, and Trump rarely retreats on personnel picks without a public war first. So expect a few days of pressure campaigns, social media posts calling Murkowski disloyal, and possibly a late-night phone call or two.
But Murkowski has survived Trump's fury before. She is one of the very few Republicans who voted to convict him after January 6th and lived to tell about it politically. She won re-election in Alaska anyway. The leverage Trump holds over most Republican senators does not apply to her in quite the same way, which is probably why she felt free to post a "no" at dawn on a Friday morning like she was canceling a brunch reservation.
The Dingo Take
You are supposed to believe that Todd Blanche is a credible, independent pick for the nation's top law enforcement job. This is the same Todd Blanche who sat across a courtroom table from Donald Trump as his personal criminal defense lawyer, argued that his client was above the law, and is now being nominated to run the very department that investigated that client. Murkowski is not asking for a saint. She is asking for someone who can say no to the president once in a while. That is a bar so low it is basically underground, and Blanche has still failed to clear it.
The Epstein files detail is worth sitting with for a moment. The Justice Department's handling of that case, the selective releases, the delays, the chaos, has been one of the clearest illustrations of what happens when DOJ starts operating as a political communications shop for the White House. Murkowski saw it, named it, and made it part of her official rationale. That is not a minor grievance. That is a senator from the president's own party saying, on the record, that the Justice Department is already compromised.
Bill Cassidy is now the most interesting man in Washington, which is an unusual thing to say about a Louisiana Republican who Trump spent considerable energy trying to destroy. The irony that Trump's revenge tour against Cassidy may have accidentally handed Cassidy the power to kill his AG pick is the kind of thing that would be funny if the stakes were not so genuinely high. The Attorney General controls federal prosecution priorities, civil rights enforcement, and the FBI. The fact that we are down to hoping one undecided senator holds the line is not reassuring. It is terrifying.
Comments