On Monday, Donald Trump posted on social media that oil prices would drop to two dollars a gallon once America wins the war with Iran. On Wednesday, oil hit $100 a barrel and gas climbed to $4.22, the highest price at the pump since June. The math here is not mathing.
How We Got to $100 Oil in One Very Bad Week
NBC News reports that Brent crude breached the $100 threshold at a little after 3 a.m. ET Wednesday, seesawing above and below that level through the early morning. The U.S. benchmark, West Texas Intermediate, is sitting around $95 a barrel. Both figures represent roughly a 40 percent increase over pre-war prices.
The trigger was a particularly ugly 48 hours in the ongoing U.S.-Iran war. The U.S. military destroyed five Iranian tankers Tuesday after Iran attempted missile strikes on a Navy warship. Tehran fired back with attacks on U.S. ships and a base in Jordan. This is what military strategists call an escalation spiral, and what the rest of us call a catastrophic situation with no visible exit ramp.
Then the Houthis decided to make it worse. The Iran-backed rebel group in Yemen launched new attacks on Saudi oil facilities this week, setting energy sites ablaze and threatening to drag America's key Gulf ally deeper into a conflict that was already burning plenty hot. When Houthi militants are torching Saudi oil infrastructure, the futures markets do not react calmly. They never do.
The Strait of Hormuz Problem Nobody Fixed
Here is a number that should have gotten more attention six months ago: one fifth of the world's oil supply flows through the Strait of Hormuz. That is not a minor shipping lane. That is the jugular vein of global energy markets.
According to NBC News, Iran throttled the Strait in response to the U.S. and Israeli war campaign that began in February. The U.S. military has managed to restore some traffic through Hormuz, but the operative word is "some." Meanwhile, the Houthis have been hammering tankers in the Red Sea, so there is no clean alternative route that avoids chaos entirely.
The administration seems to have concluded that a maritime blockade squeezing the Iranian economy would force a resolution. Months in, the resolution has not arrived. The blockade is still running. The violent flare-ups, as NBC News notes, have actually increased in recent days. At some point a strategy that is not working needs a new name.
Trump's $2 Gas Promise vs. the Actual Universe
Let's revisit Monday, shall we. Trump posted on social media that oil prices would drop "precipitously, like everything else is dropping (but more!)" once the U.S. wins the war with Iran. He specifically suggested gas could fall to two dollars a gallon.
Two days later, NBC News reports gas is at $4.22, the highest it has been since early June. Brent crude hit $100. The war has no resolution in sight. Two dollars a gallon is not a forecast. It is a fever dream.
This is not a small rhetorical gap to paper over. The administration started a war in February, that war has pushed oil 40 percent above pre-war levels, and the president is still promising pump prices last seen during a global pandemic demand collapse. Republicans running in November's midterms are reportedly worried about consumer anger over rising prices. As well they should be.
What $100 Oil Means for Everyone Who Buys Gas
The short version: you are paying more, and the timeline for paying less is genuinely unclear. Gas at $4.22 a gallon is painful enough on its own, but oil at $100 a barrel means those prices have room to climb further if the conflict keeps escalating. Futures markets price in risk, and right now the risk menu is extensive.
The White House is clearly watching the political exposure. According to NBC News, the rising prices are of significant concern to both the administration and Republicans ahead of the midterm elections. War is expensive in ways that show up at the gas station, the grocery store, and in shipping costs that ripple through the entire consumer economy. The midterm math gets uglier every time a Houthi drone finds a Saudi oil tank.
Brent crude did briefly pull back from $100 during Wednesday morning trading, but the structural pressures have not changed. The Strait of Hormuz is still partly choked. The Houthis are still active. Iran is still fighting. And the gap between Trump's promises and the reality at your local Exxon is now measured in dollars per gallon.
The Dingo Take
Two dollars a gallon. The president of the United States, who started a war in February that has sent oil prices 40 percent higher, went on social media two days ago and promised two dollar gasoline. Gas is $4.22. Oil is $100 a barrel. Iranian-backed rebels just set Saudi oil facilities on fire. There is no diplomatic track visible to anyone covering this conflict, and the military strategy of economic strangulation has produced, so far, a lot of Iranian missile attacks on U.S. warships.
The maddening thing is that there is no accountability mechanism for a promise this disconnected from reality. Trump said prices would drop precipitously. They went the other direction, dramatically, within 48 hours. In a functional political environment this would be a five-alarm credibility crisis. Instead it will become a talking point that gets refined and re-issued until the base believes the $4.22 gas is somehow the Democrats' fault.
What nobody in the administration wants to answer is the actual strategic question: what does winning this war look like, and how long does it take, and what does the American consumer absorb in the meantime? Because right now the answer to all three is "we have no idea," and $100 oil is the market's polite way of saying it noticed.
Comments