The Justice Department told a federal court on Tuesday that Donald Trump's proposed 250-foot triumphal arch, the one he wants for himself, will not be finished until after he is out of office. Construction could take up to 39 months. The president's second term has roughly 26 left.
So the monument is a gift to a future America that will have to decide whether to keep it, tear it down, or run tours explaining what the hell happened.
The Math Does Not Math
Here is the timeline the government filed with the court, as reported by The Guardian. If the project gets the green light, excavation and foundation work could start as soon as Thursday and run six to eight months. Above-ground construction begins in May 2027 at the earliest. Total build time: 33 to 39 months.
Do the arithmetic. Even on the fast end, the ribbon-cutting lands well past January 2029. The man commissioning the thing will be cutting that ribbon as a former president, assuming whoever is in charge then even invites him.
That is a strange kind of monument. Most leaders at least try to be around for the unveiling.
A Very Large Paris Knockoff Across the River
The design is modeled on the Arc de Triomphe in Paris. Planned location: near Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia, just across the Potomac from Washington. Height: 250 feet, or 76 meters if you prefer your vanity projects in metric.
The National Capital Planning Commission is scheduled to meet Thursday to approve it. The Interior Department said in a court filing it may issue its own final approval the same day. The National Park Service might hand over a permit or other authorization that same Thursday too.
That is a lot of Thursday. Funny how fast a government can move when the project has the boss's name on the vibe, if not yet on the stone.
Virginia, DC, and Veterans Walk Into a Courtroom
Opposition is not subtle. Virginia and the District of Columbia sued the National Park Service and the Interior Department on Saturday, trying to stop construction before it starts. Their filing calls the project "legally indefensible" and argues Congress never approved it.
That last part matters. Congress is the branch that typically gets a say in permanent monuments on federal land in the nation's capital. The administration's apparent position is that asking is for other people.
Several veterans have also sued. Their argument is that the arch would wreck the historic sightline between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery. That view is one of the most carefully preserved in American civic geography, and the plan is to stick a 25-story ornamental gate in the middle of it.
Drones, Apparently
The government asked Judge Tanya Chutkan to reject the effort to halt construction. Its justification is a genuine head-scratcher: the arch's location and height could help defend the capital from evolving threats such as drones.
Read that again. A triumphal arch. Modeled on a Napoleonic victory monument. As counter-drone infrastructure.
Nobody has explained how a big stone arch stops a quadcopter. Maybe the drones are deterred by neoclassical grandeur. Maybe they get emotional and turn back.
Planes, Floodlights, and an Eternal Flame
Others have raised a more practical concern: the arch sits close to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and inside its main approach and departure corridors. Putting a 250-foot structure in a flight path is the kind of thing aviation people tend to notice.
The Federal Aviation Administration found the arch does not pose aviation safety risks. Part of the fix is that the arch will include an eternal flame and floodlight projectors pointed at it so pilots can see it.
So the plan is to make the obstacle brighter. Problem solved, in the way that putting a lamp on a coffee table solves stubbing your toe.
The Rest of the Redecorating
The arch is one piece of a larger makeover of the capital. The administration has also pushed to renovate the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool and redevelop a golf course in East Potomac Park. Trump's name has gone onto the US Institute of Peace, and there has been an attempt to add it to the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.
Taken together, it looks less like urban planning and more like a man walking through a city with a label maker. Reflecting pool, golf course, peace institute, performing arts center. Every landmark is a surface, and every surface is a billboard.
The Dingo Take
Who benefits from a monument that opens after the guy who wanted it has left? Not the public, who never asked for it and whose representatives in Congress apparently never got the vote. The beneficiary is the legacy project itself: a permanent, 250-foot piece of real estate with a name-recognition payoff that lasts long after any presidency ends. And the contractors who take the excavation and foundation work, which starts first and is the easy money, will be paid whether or not anyone ever sees an arch.
The timeline tells you everything. A 33 to 39 month build, approvals rushed to a single Thursday, and a legal defense that leans on drones and an eternal flame to keep pilots from hitting it. Nobody doing this for the country moves like this. People move like this when they want facts on the ground before a judge, a Congress, or an election can say no.
Chutkan has the case. Virginia, DC, and a group of veterans are asking her to slow it down. They have a decent argument: Congress did not approve this, and the sightline between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington is not a decorative extra. If the shovels go in on Thursday, undoing it later will be a lot harder than stopping it now.
Comments